Iowa Gamers
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Iowa Gamers

Trading Cards, Gaming, ect.
 
HomePortalSearchLatest imagesRegisterLog in

 

 Acitive Field Spell vs. activated field spell negation

Go down 
AuthorMessage
Shawn W
Admin
Shawn W


Number of posts : 1087
Age : 55
Location : Cedar Rapids, Ia
Registration date : 2007-01-18

Acitive Field Spell vs. activated field spell negation Empty
PostSubject: Acitive Field Spell vs. activated field spell negation   Acitive Field Spell vs. activated field spell negation EmptySat Apr 28, 2007 8:30 pm

Here's the scenerio, Player A has an acitve Field Spell, Player B activates another Field Spell, Player A then uses "Solemn Judgment"/"Cursed Seal of the Forbidden Spell"/etc. What will happens to Player As Field Spell?

Am I right to assume that since the 2nd field spells activation was negated, it was never technically active, meaning Player As Field Spell would stay in effect?


Answer:

Player A's Field Spell Card will remain in play because the activation of Player B's Field Spell Card was negated by the "Solemn Judgment"/"Cursed Seal of the Forbidden Spell"/etc.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
Curtis Schultz
Official UDE Rules Dude
CurtisSchultz_Netrep@Hotmail.com
Back to top Go down
http://www.tempestgames.net/
 
Acitive Field Spell vs. activated field spell negation
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Field Spell Vs. Field Spell - What! MST!?
» Can a player Set Field Spells in the Spell and Trap Card Zon
» Can a player Set Field Spells in the Spell and Trap Card
» Field Spells - Replacing my own Field
» Active Field Card versus Set Field Card ...

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Iowa Gamers :: Information :: Yu-Gi-Oh Official Judges List-
Jump to: