Here's the problem: AND is the key word here, and is what is in question...
Card Destruction uses the word and and is ruled that it doesn't work with peten the dark clown, but Norleras' is ruled that is does...
It seems that these rulings should conflict... So I'm looking either for an offical ruling, or moreso, an explanation as to why each of those are ruled differently...
Hand destruction is worded almost exlactly like card destruction and would probably be ruled the same... But Norleras seems to contradict that, so why is that???
(Also, with the rulings reversal for continuous traps, might there be a similar occurance with this scenario)?